I'm not on deadline this weekend (hooray!). Between that and the fact that we got to turn the clocks back an hour, I finally had a chance to go back through my RWI neighborhood stories and incorporate at least some of the edits suggested by Prof. Padwe and our adjunct instructor, Brent ("The Terminator") Cunningham. I spent the morning sending revised versions to a bunch of my sources, nerve-racking though it was.
I'll post them here, too, shortly, but first I thought I'd give you a sense of why it was anxiety-provoking to send my stories out into the world (or, at least, into a few random people's e-mailboxes). I'm 12 weeks into this life- and mind-altering experience known as j-school, and I'm still struggling to assimilate everything I'm learning and doing. The pace is so relentless that the opportunities to reflect on and process the experience are exceedingly rare, and that means I am nearly always somewhat off-kilter.
Some of it is just the challenge of juggling multiple deadlines, but mostly it's the challenge of trying to do a job that is so much harder than I possibly could have imagined. Truth-seeking (reporting) and truth-telling (writing) are two very different crafts -- maybe even arts -- and mastering them, if that's even possible, will be a career-long endeavor. At this point, the learning curve still feels nearly vertical, despite the occasional small victories.
I wrote about this feeling -- that I'm not yet a journalist -- in a paper for Critical Issues in Journalism that I turned in about 10 days ago. Here it is:
Am I a Journalist?In our very first Critical Issues class, we tackled the existential question of whether those of us in the master’s program at Columbia are in fact journalists. We talked about the fact that journalists aren’t licensed or regulated and that, therefore, they are a population that defines themselves. Then Professor Wald gave us his definition of a journalist: one who does regular work intended for publication for a general audience. And even though our current work is unedited, and therefore not “core journalism,” Professor Wald included us in his definition. “You are journalists because you attempt the truth,” he said. “If you achieve it, you’re good journalists.”
As much as I like the elegance of Professor Wald’s reasoning, and as much as I would like to call myself a journalist, somehow I just can’t. I couldn’t then, just six weeks into the semester, and I can’t now, with another month of the program under my belt. Perhaps that’s because I’ve come to journalism relatively late, at 38. (The reasons for the midlife shift would require an entirely different existential inquiry.) I had another career before I arrived at Columbia, and I know what it means to have achieved some mastery in one’s profession. I can say with great certainty that I have not yet done that in journalism.
I have the business cards that say “Reporter,” the press pass (which I’ve never flashed), and a stockpile of spiral-bound reporter’s notebooks, but I don’t have the instincts or the skills of a journalist. Every day, I struggle to synthesize and assimilate all that I’m learning, in the classroom and on my beat. I am a neophyte, and this, it seems, is my probationary period. I am grateful for it.
I’m still figuring out how to write a lede and a nut graph, how to invert the pyramid, how to take notes without crippling my writing hand or missing great quotes, and how to meet a deadline and get a full night’s sleep in the same 24-hour period. I’m still developing my eye and my ear, and I’m still deconstructing AP style.
Calling myself a journalist today would be like putting on a white lab coat and calling myself a doctor. It might fool other people, but I know the truth: I’m a student. A good student, perhaps. A diligent student for sure. A promising student, I hope. But a student nonetheless. I may not need a license to practice journalism, but I do need a solid grounding in journalistic principles and practices, and I don’t have that yet. I’m working on it, very assiduously, and I know that I am making progress, but the finish line is not yet in sight.
This is why, when I talk to sources, I always identify myself as a student right away. I’m not ready to hold myself out as anything more at this point, and I don’t think it would be honest to do so. I have a readership of one at the moment (two if you count my adjunct professor in RWI), and while I hope that number will grow considerably, it’s probably about right for the time being. With every story I file and every one I read in the newspaper, I wonder at how I will bridge the divide between the two. How do professional journalists build their stories so quickly, so thoroughly? How do they write them so compellingly? How do they chase down, and then confirm, every last fact with a deadline staring them down? These are all lessons I have yet to learn.
In class, Professor Wald said that the health of our democracy is guaranteed by the fact that anyone can be a journalist. I am heartened by the notion that I can be a journalist, that waiting until I was 38 to start down this path didn’t disqualify me at the gate. Still, I know that I am not yet a journalist. I haven’t earned the title. And knowing that means that once I do, I will value and respect it all the more.
In the meantime, I am focused on finding my way in this world. I read, I write, I report, and I think. I file my stories week after week. I pitch ideas, I track down sources, I cut words, and I polish sentences. And slowly, over time, I learn what it means, and what it takes, to be a journalist.